Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Fear of missing out on AI: A psychological cost of technological revolution
1
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
• Newly developed English FOMO-AI scale shows strong psychometric properties. • One in nine U.S. adults report elevated FOMO-AI, especially younger adults and women. • Higher AI literacy buffers against FOMO-AI, while attitudes toward AI show no effect. • FOMO-AI predicts depressive and anxiety symptoms and reduces well-being. Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming education, healthcare, governance, and work at unprecedented speed, but such rapid development also raises new psychological and societal challenges. One emerging concern is fear of missing out on AI (FOMO-AI) – the worry that one’s AI skills or access lag behind others. This study validates an English FOMO-AI scale in a U.S. adult sample ( N = 557) and applies it to address three questions: (1) What is the prevalence and demographic distribution of FOMO-AI? (2) How do AI literacy and attitudes shape FOMO-AI? (3) Does FOMO-AI predict mental-health and well-being outcomes? Findings showed that although most people fortunately reported low FOMO-AI, a meaningful minority (more than one in nine) endorsed elevated levels, with younger adults and women being more vulnerable. Furthermore, AI literacy, but not general attitudes toward AI, emerged as the central mechanism shaping FOMO-AI, with higher literacy buffering against it and lower literacy exacerbating it. Importantly, FOMO-AI predicted greater anxiety and depressive symptoms, which, in turn, reduced well-being. Together, these results highlight FOMO-AI as a new, measurable psychological cost of technological revolution and underscore that the future of AI is not only a technological challenge but also a human one.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.231 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.084 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.444 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.423 Zit.