Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
An empirical framework for assessing AI in early childhood education: a global versus local perspective
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence into education necessitates a rigorous evaluation of its effectiveness, particularly in culturally and developmentally sensitive contexts. This study addresses this need by developing and applying a novel evaluation framework for early childhood education (ECE). We conducted a comparative analysis of four leading AI models—two global (ChatGPT and Gemini) and two prominent local Chinese (Doubao and DeepSeek) models—using seven theory-grounded prompts within a Chinese ECE context. Through blind expert ratings and statistical analyses (ANOVA, MANOVA), we found that local Chinese models significantly outperformed global models on tasks requiring cultural nuance and pedagogical alignment, with effect sizes (Cohen’s d) reaching as high as 14.63. These findings highlight the critical limitations of a one-size-fits-all approach and argue that deep localization is essential for developing effective and equitable AI-driven educational tools.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.316 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.177 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.575 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.468 Zit.