Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ADOPTION OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW BASED ON THE THEORY OF DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION
0
Zitationen
8
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
The development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) presents both new opportunities andchallenges in the field of education. This technology has the potential to transform learning practices, assessment,and knowledge management. However, its adoption process is not linear and is influenced by pedagogical, social,ethical, and institutional factors. This study aims to analyze the adoption of Generative AI in education using theDiffusion of Innovation Theory framework. The research method employed is a Systematic Literature Review(SLR) of 27 reputable national and international journal articles published between 2022 and 2024. The literatureselection process followed the PRISMA guidelines, consisting of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusionstages. The findings indicate that Generative AI offers relative advantages in supporting personalized learning,improving learning efficiency, and expanding access to learning resources. However, complexity of use,compatibility issues with academic integrity values, and concerns regarding ethics and data privacy are majorbarriers to adoption. The successful utilization of Generative AI in education requires innovation diffusionstrategies supported by institutional policies, enhancement of digital literacy, and reinforcement of educational andcultural values.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis
2021 · 1.484 Zit.
Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis
2010 · 1.346 Zit.
A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers
2020 · 1.332 Zit.
COVID-19 pandemic
2021 · 488 Zit.
Fundamentos Epistémicos de la Investigación Cualitativa y Cuantitativa: Consensos y Disensos
2019 · 404 Zit.