Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Chat, is this Education?
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Generative AI (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT and CoPilot have been rapidly adopted for use in software development both in industry and by students. While it is possible that GenAI could allow for personalised and accessible learning, there are well-founded concerns that the use of GenAI by students results in little to no learning and may even result in students losing or failing to develop critical thinking skills, due to an overabundance of faith in the accuracy of GenAI tools. Examining the impact of GenAI can be difficult, as students are often reluctant to admit usage of GenAI, due to fear of repercussions from lecturers or institutions, and GenAI detectors are unreliable. In this paper we will discuss a proposed system for sorting student coding assignments into groups with varying degrees of confidence that the work has or has not been created using GenAI. With these groups we aim to compare work entirely generated by GenAI, partially generated by GenAI, and without using GenAI at all. In future work, we will compare these groups in terms of academic outcomes for first- and second-year computer science modules.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.260 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.116 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.493 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.438 Zit.