Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluating Guideline Adherence in Gemini‐Powered Dental Trauma Workflows: Standalone Gemini Chat vs. Document‐Grounded NotebookLM
0
Zitationen
8
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
The responses generated from the guidelines were highly consistent with both workflows. Document grounding may enhance repeatability and alignment with guideline-derived decision points for structured dichotomous inquiries, as evidenced by NotebookLM's ability to achieve complete inter-account consistency and to quantitatively increase accuracy. These results are the outcome of workflow-level benchmarking; therefore, clinical utility cannot be inferred solely from them; professional oversight and additional validation remain necessary before any clinical application.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale.
1991 · 3.966 Zit.
Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review
2005 · 3.758 Zit.
Radiobiology for the Radiologist.
1974 · 3.501 Zit.
International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound
2012 · 2.808 Zit.
Radiation Dose Associated With Common Computed Tomography Examinations and the Associated Lifetime Attributable Risk of Cancer
2009 · 2.428 Zit.