Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Assessing ChatGPT Feedback for EFL Learners’ Engagement and Writing Performance
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
ABSTRACT Grounded in engagement theory and feedback literacy, which emphasize the interplay of emotional, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions in learning to write, the present study examines the comparative effectiveness of peer feedback and ChatGPT‐generated feedback in the context of English as a foreign language (EFL) writing. We utilized a quantitative method to examine the comparative effectiveness of peer feedback and ChatGPT‐generated feedback in the context of EFL writing. The participants were 174 university students enrolled in a mandatory writing course in China. The control group, consisting of 90 participants, utilized only conventional peer feedback, whereas the treatment group, with 84 participants, incorporated feedback generated by ChatGPT, employing specifically crafted prompts to assist in their writing revisions. A validated survey on engagement was conducted at the start and conclusion of the semester. The participants also completed a writing test. They also completed an internal writing test, focusing on five sections: filling in blanks, paraphrasing, sentence construction, paragraph writing, and essay composition. The findings revealed that students in the ChatGPT group experienced significant improvements in affective (estimate = 0.45) and behavioral engagement (estimate = 0.29), as well as notable advancements in their writing performance (“group × time” interaction estimate = 4.19). The study concludes with a discussion of the pedagogical implications for incorporating AI‐generated feedback tools into EFL writing instruction.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.485 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.371 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.827 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.549 Zit.