Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Author Correction: Best humans still outperform artificial intelligence in a creative divergent thinking task
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The original version of this Article contained errors in the Results, under the subheading 'Overall human and AI performance' , where the data analysis related to Figure 2D was incorrect due to an error in the data analysis code.As a result, "Additionally, the max scores were higher for AI than humans (Fig. 2D), B = 0.453, SE = 0.082, CI [0.286, 0.613], t( 282) = 5.495, p < 0.001.Fluency decreased the max scores, B = -0.088,SE= 0.023, CI [-0.133, -0.043], t(283) = -3.877,p < 0.001." now reads: "Additionally, the max scores were higher for AI than humans (Fig. 2D), B = 0.403, SE = 0.091, CI [0.226, 0.581], t(280) = 4.444, p < 0.001.Fluency increased the max scores, B = 0.139, SE= 0.025, CI [0.090, 0.188], t(282) = 5.533, p < 0.001.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.402 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.270 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.702 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.507 Zit.