Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The Role of AI in Advancing Scientific Research from Hypothesis to Publication
0
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly evolved from a supportive computational tool to a transformative driver of scientific research, permeating nearly every stage of the research lifecycle. No longer confined to isolated applications, AI is now integrated into the broader ecosystem of inquiry, reshaping the way hypotheses are formulated, data are collected and analyzed, experiments are designed, and findings are disseminated. Breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), multimodal AI, and agentic workflows have expanded the scope of research capabilities, enabling systems that not only process information but also reason across disciplines, generate novel insights, and automate complex workflows. This paper presents a comprehensive narrative review of 36 recent studies that examine AI’s contributions to scientific research, with particular attention to its integration across key phases: literature discovery, hypothesis generation, experimental design, data analysis, visualization, manuscript drafting, and peer review. In addition, the review highlights AI’s applications in STEM, biomedical sciences, social sciences, and interdisciplinary domains, demonstrating its potential to accelerate innovation and bridge methodological gaps. The role of AI in systematic reviews and meta-analyses is emphasized, underscoring its ability to improve reproducibility and efficiency while reducing research timelines. Beyond opportunities, the review critically examines risks including bias, hallucination, overfitting, data privacy, authorship, and academic integrity. Ethical frameworks such as model cards, AI usage cards, and international governance standards are explored as essential mechanisms for ensuring transparency, fairness, and accountability. The findings suggest that AI should be regarded not as a substitute for human inquiry but as a collaborative partner that amplifies creativity, enhances rigor, and accelerates the production of scientific knowledge. By embedding ethical safeguards and reproducibility standards, AI can serve as both a catalyst for discovery and a guardian of research integrity in the evolving landscape of twenty-first century science.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.456 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.332 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.779 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.533 Zit.